ISO-IEC-27005-RISK-MANAGER VALID TEST FEE | EXAM ISO-IEC-27005-RISK-MANAGER QUICK PREP

ISO-IEC-27005-Risk-Manager Valid Test Fee | Exam ISO-IEC-27005-Risk-Manager Quick Prep

ISO-IEC-27005-Risk-Manager Valid Test Fee | Exam ISO-IEC-27005-Risk-Manager Quick Prep

Blog Article

Tags: ISO-IEC-27005-Risk-Manager Valid Test Fee, Exam ISO-IEC-27005-Risk-Manager Quick Prep, ISO-IEC-27005-Risk-Manager Real Exam Questions, Reliable ISO-IEC-27005-Risk-Manager Braindumps Ebook, Questions ISO-IEC-27005-Risk-Manager Pdf

The next step to do is to take PECB ISO-IEC-27005-Risk-Manager. These ISO-IEC-27005-Risk-Manager practice questions can help you measure your skill to see if it has already met the standard set by PECB ISO-IEC-27005-Risk-Manager. To optimize the effectiveness, We have made the ISO-IEC-27005-Risk-Manager Practice Test using the same format as the PECB Certified ISO/IEC 27005 Risk Manager exam. All PECB Exam Dumps questions appearing on the mock test are the ones we carefully predicted to appear on your upcoming exam.

The best way for candidates to know our ISO-IEC-27005-Risk-Manager training dumps is downloading our free demo. We provide free PDF demo for each exam. This free demo is a small part of the official complete PECB ISO-IEC-27005-Risk-Manager training dumps. The free demo can show you the quality of our exam materials. You can download any time before purchasing. You can tell if our products and service have advantage over others. I believe our PECB ISO-IEC-27005-Risk-Manager training dumps will be the highest value with competitive price comparing other providers.

>> ISO-IEC-27005-Risk-Manager Valid Test Fee <<

Accurate ISO-IEC-27005-Risk-Manager Valid Test Fee | ISO-IEC-27005-Risk-Manager 100% Free Exam Quick Prep

Holding a ISO-IEC-27005-Risk-Manager certification in a certain field definitely shows that one have a good command of the ISO-IEC-27005-Risk-Manager knowledge and professional skills in the related field. However, it is universally accepted that the majority of the candidates for the PECB Certified ISO/IEC 27005 Risk Manager exam are those who do not have enough spare time and are not able to study in the most efficient way. Our ISO-IEC-27005-Risk-Manager Study Materials sove this problem perfectly for you with high-efficience and you will know if you can just have a try!

PECB Certified ISO/IEC 27005 Risk Manager Sample Questions (Q41-Q46):

NEW QUESTION # 41
Which of the following risk assessment methods provides an information security risk assessment methodology and involves three phases build asset-based threat profiles, identify infrastructure vulnerabilities, and develop security strategy and plans?

  • A. OCTAVE-S
  • B. TRA
  • C. MEHARI

Answer: A

Explanation:
OCTAVE-S (Operationally Critical Threat, Asset, and Vulnerability Evaluation for Small Organizations) is a risk assessment methodology tailored for small organizations. It provides a structured approach for identifying and managing information security risks. The OCTAVE-S method involves three main phases:
Building asset-based threat profiles, where critical assets and their associated threats are identified.
Identifying infrastructure vulnerabilities by assessing the organization's technological infrastructure for weaknesses that could be exploited by threats.
Developing security strategy and plans to address the identified risks and improve the overall security posture.
The OCTAVE-S method aligns with the description provided in the question, making it the correct answer. MEHARI and TRA are other risk assessment methods, but they do not specifically follow the three phases outlined above.


NEW QUESTION # 42
Scenario 6: Productscape is a market research company headquartered in Brussels, Belgium. It helps organizations understand the needs and expectations of their customers and identify new business opportunities. Productscape's teams have extensive experience in marketing and business strategy and work with some of the best-known organizations in Europe. The industry in which Productscape operates requires effective risk management. Considering that Productscape has access to clients' confidential information, it is responsible for ensuring its security. As such, the company conducts regular risk assessments. The top management appointed Alex as the risk manager, who is responsible for monitoring the risk management process and treating information security risks.
The last risk assessment conducted was focused on information assets. The purpose of this risk assessment was to identify information security risks, understand their level, and take appropriate action to treat them in order to ensure the security of their systems. Alex established a team of three members to perform the risk assessment activities. Each team member was responsible for specific departments included in the risk assessment scope. The risk assessment provided valuable information to identify, understand, and mitigate the risks that Productscape faces.
Initially, the team identified potential risks based on the risk identification results. Prior to analyzing the identified risks, the risk acceptance criteria were established. The criteria for accepting the risks were determined based on Productscape's objectives, operations, and technology. The team created various risk scenarios and determined the likelihood of occurrence as "low," "medium," or "high." They decided that if the likelihood of occurrence for a risk scenario is determined as "low," no further action would be taken. On the other hand, if the likelihood of occurrence for a risk scenario is determined as "high" or "medium," additional controls will be implemented. Some information security risk scenarios defined by Productscape's team were as follows:
1. A cyber attacker exploits a security misconfiguration vulnerability of Productscape's website to launch an attack, which, in turn, could make the website unavailable to users.
2. A cyber attacker gains access to confidential information of clients and may threaten to make the information publicly available unless a ransom is paid.
3. An internal employee clicks on a link embedded in an email that redirects them to an unsecured website, installing a malware on the device.
The likelihood of occurrence for the first risk scenario was determined as "medium." One of the main reasons that such a risk could occur was the usage of default accounts and password. Attackers could exploit this vulnerability and launch a brute-force attack. Therefore, Productscape decided to start using an automated "build and deploy" process which would test the software on deploy and minimize the likelihood of such an incident from happening. However, the team made it clear that the implementation of this process would not eliminate the risk completely and that there was still a low possibility for this risk to occur. Productscape documented the remaining risk and decided to monitor it for changes.
The likelihood of occurrence for the second risk scenario was determined as "medium." Productscape decided to contract an IT company that would provide technical assistance and monitor the company's systems and networks in order to prevent such incidents from happening.
The likelihood of occurrence for the third risk scenario was determined as "high." Thus, Productscape decided to include phishing as a topic on their information security training sessions. In addition, Alex reviewed the controls of Annex A of ISO/IEC 27001 in order to determine the necessary controls for treating this risk. Alex decided to implement control A.8.23 Web filtering which would help the company to reduce the risk of accessing unsecure websites. Although security controls were implemented to treat the risk, the level of the residual risk still did not meet the risk acceptance criteria defined in the beginning of the risk assessment process. Since the cost of implementing additional controls was too high for the company, Productscape decided to accept the residual risk. Therefore, risk owners were assigned the responsibility of managing the residual risk.
Based on scenario 6, Alex reviewed the controls of Annex A of ISO/IEC 27001 to determine the necessary controls for treating the risk described in the third risk scenario. According to the guidelines of ISO/IEC 27005, is this acceptable?

  • A. No, organizations should define custom controls that accurately reflect the selected information security risk treatment options
  • B. Yes. organizations should select all controls from a chosen control set that are necessary for treating the risks
  • C. No, Annex A controls should be used as a control set only if the organization seeks compliance to ISO/IEC 27001

Answer: B

Explanation:
According to ISO/IEC 27005, organizations can use any set of controls to treat identified risks as long as they are appropriate and necessary for managing those risks. Annex A of ISO/IEC 27001 provides a comprehensive set of controls that can be used to mitigate various information security risks. In this scenario, Alex reviewed the controls from Annex A of ISO/IEC 27001 and selected control A.8.23 (Web filtering) to treat the risk associated with phishing and accessing unsecured websites. This approach aligns with ISO/IEC 27005, which allows selecting relevant controls from any set to effectively manage risks. Therefore, option C is the correct answer.
Reference:
ISO/IEC 27005:2018, Clause 8.6, "Risk Treatment," which allows for selecting controls from a set, such as Annex A of ISO/IEC 27001, to treat risks appropriately.


NEW QUESTION # 43
Scenario 6: Productscape is a market research company headquartered in Brussels, Belgium. It helps organizations understand the needs and expectations of their customers and identify new business opportunities. Productscape's teams have extensive experience in marketing and business strategy and work with some of the best-known organizations in Europe. The industry in which Productscape operates requires effective risk management. Considering that Productscape has access to clients' confidential information, it is responsible for ensuring its security. As such, the company conducts regular risk assessments. The top management appointed Alex as the risk manager, who is responsible for monitoring the risk management process and treating information security risks.
The last risk assessment conducted was focused on information assets. The purpose of this risk assessment was to identify information security risks, understand their level, and take appropriate action to treat them in order to ensure the security of their systems. Alex established a team of three members to perform the risk assessment activities. Each team member was responsible for specific departments included in the risk assessment scope. The risk assessment provided valuable information to identify, understand, and mitigate the risks that Productscape faces.
Initially, the team identified potential risks based on the risk identification results. Prior to analyzing the identified risks, the risk acceptance criteria were established. The criteria for accepting the risks were determined based on Productscape's objectives, operations, and technology. The team created various risk scenarios and determined the likelihood of occurrence as "low," "medium," or "high." They decided that if the likelihood of occurrence for a risk scenario is determined as "low," no further action would be taken. On the other hand, if the likelihood of occurrence for a risk scenario is determined as "high" or "medium," additional controls will be implemented. Some information security risk scenarios defined by Productscape's team were as follows:
1. A cyber attacker exploits a security misconfiguration vulnerability of Productscape's website to launch an attack, which, in turn, could make the website unavailable to users.
2. A cyber attacker gains access to confidential information of clients and may threaten to make the information publicly available unless a ransom is paid.
3. An internal employee clicks on a link embedded in an email that redirects them to an unsecured website, installing a malware on the device.
The likelihood of occurrence for the first risk scenario was determined as "medium." One of the main reasons that such a risk could occur was the usage of default accounts and password. Attackers could exploit this vulnerability and launch a brute-force attack. Therefore, Productscape decided to start using an automated "build and deploy" process which would test the software on deploy and minimize the likelihood of such an incident from happening. However, the team made it clear that the implementation of this process would not eliminate the risk completely and that there was still a low possibility for this risk to occur. Productscape documented the remaining risk and decided to monitor it for changes.
The likelihood of occurrence for the second risk scenario was determined as "medium." Productscape decided to contract an IT company that would provide technical assistance and monitor the company's systems and networks in order to prevent such incidents from happening.
The likelihood of occurrence for the third risk scenario was determined as "high." Thus, Productscape decided to include phishing as a topic on their information security training sessions. In addition, Alex reviewed the controls of Annex A of ISO/IEC 27001 in order to determine the necessary controls for treating this risk. Alex decided to implement control A.8.23 Web filtering which would help the company to reduce the risk of accessing unsecure websites. Although security controls were implemented to treat the risk, the level of the residual risk still did not meet the risk acceptance criteria defined in the beginning of the risk assessment process. Since the cost of implementing additional controls was too high for the company, Productscape decided to accept the residual risk. Therefore, risk owners were assigned the responsibility of managing the residual risk.
Based on the scenario above, answer the following question:
Which risk treatment option was used for the first risk scenario?

  • A. Risk sharing
  • B. Risk modification
  • C. Risk avoidance

Answer: B

Explanation:
Risk modification involves implementing measures to reduce the likelihood or impact of a risk. In the first risk scenario, Productscape decided to use an automated "build and deploy" process to reduce the likelihood of an attacker exploiting a security misconfiguration vulnerability. This action aims to lower the risk to an acceptable level, which is characteristic of risk modification. Option B (Risk avoidance) would involve eliminating the risk by avoiding the activity altogether, which is not what was done. Option C (Risk sharing) involves transferring some or all of the risk to a third party, which is not applicable in this scenario.


NEW QUESTION # 44
Scenario 2: Travivve is a travel agency that operates in more than 100 countries. Headquartered in San Francisco, the US, the agency is known for its personalized vacation packages and travel services. Travivve aims to deliver reliable services that meet its clients' needs. Considering the impact of information security in its reputation, Travivve decided to implement an information security management system (ISMS) based on ISO/IEC 27001. In addition, they decided to establish and implement an information security risk management program. Based on the priority of specific departments in Travivve, the top management decided to initially apply the risk management process only in the Sales Management Department. The process would be applicable for other departments only when introducing new technology.
Travivve's top management wanted to make sure that the risk management program is established based on the industry best practices. Therefore, they created a team of three members that would be responsible for establishing and implementing it. One of the team members was Travivve's risk manager who was responsible for supervising the team and planning all risk management activities. In addition, the risk manager was responsible for monitoring the program and reporting the monitoring results to the top management.
Initially, the team decided to analyze the internal and external context of Travivve. As part of the process of understanding the organization and its context, the team identified key processes and activities. Then, the team identified the interested parties and their basic requirements and determined the status of compliance with these requirements. In addition, the team identified all the reference documents that applied to the defined scope of the risk management process, which mainly included the Annex A of ISO/IEC 27001 and the internal security rules established by Travivve. Lastly, the team analyzed both reference documents and justified a few noncompliances with those requirements.
The risk manager selected the information security risk management method which was aligned with other approaches used by the company to manage other risks. The team also communicated the risk management process to all interested parties through previously established communication mechanisms. In addition, they made sure to inform all interested parties about their roles and responsibilities regarding risk management. Travivve also decided to involve interested parties in its risk management activities since, according to the top management, this process required their active participation.
Lastly, Travivve's risk management team decided to conduct the initial information security risk assessment process. As such, the team established the criteria for performing the information security risk assessment which included the consequence criteria and likelihood criteria.
Based on scenario 2, the team decided to involve interested parties in risk management activities. Is this a good practice?

  • A. No. only internal interested parties should be involved in risk management activities
  • B. Yes, relevant interested parties should be involved in risk management activities to ensure the successful completion of the risk assessment
  • C. No, only the risk management team should be involved in risk management activities

Answer: B

Explanation:
According to ISO/IEC 27005, involving relevant interested parties in the risk management process is considered a best practice. This approach ensures that all perspectives are considered, and relevant knowledge is leveraged, which helps in comprehensively identifying, analyzing, and managing risks. Interested parties, such as stakeholders, can provide valuable insights and information regarding the organization's assets, processes, threats, and vulnerabilities, contributing to a more accurate and effective risk assessment. Therefore, option B is correct because it supports the principle that involving relevant parties leads to a more successful risk assessment process. Options A and C are incorrect because excluding either external interested parties or restricting involvement only to the risk management team would limit the effectiveness of the risk management process.


NEW QUESTION # 45
Which of the following statements best defines information security risk?

  • A. Potential cause of an unwanted incident related to information security that can cause harm to an organization
  • B. The potential that threats will exploit vulnerabilities of an information asset and cause harm to an organization
  • C. Weakness of an asset or control that can be exploited by one or a group of threats

Answer: B

Explanation:
Information security risk, as defined by ISO/IEC 27005, is "the potential that a threat will exploit a vulnerability of an asset or group of assets and thereby cause harm to the organization." This definition emphasizes the interplay between threats (e.g., cyber attackers, natural disasters), vulnerabilities (e.g., weaknesses in software, inadequate security controls), and the potential impact or harm that could result from this exploitation. Therefore, option A is the most comprehensive and accurate description of information security risk. In contrast, option B describes a vulnerability, and option C focuses on the cause of an incident rather than defining risk itself. Option A aligns directly with the risk definition in ISO/IEC 27005.


NEW QUESTION # 46
......

You may want to own a ISO-IEC-27005-Risk-Manager certificate to prove that you are competent and boost excellent practical abilities in some certain area. Thus you will be regarded as the capable people and be respected. Passing the test ISO-IEC-27005-Risk-Manager certification can help you realize your goals and if you buy our ISO-IEC-27005-Risk-Manager Guide Torrent you will pass the ISO-IEC-27005-Risk-Manager exam easily. Our ISO-IEC-27005-Risk-Manager exam questions are written by the most professional experts, so the quality of our ISO-IEC-27005-Risk-Manager learning material is wonderful. And we always keep our ISO-IEC-27005-Risk-Manager study guide the most updated for you to pass the exam.

Exam ISO-IEC-27005-Risk-Manager Quick Prep: https://www.testkingpdf.com/ISO-IEC-27005-Risk-Manager-testking-pdf-torrent.html

PECB ISO-IEC-27005-Risk-Manager Valid Test Fee How to increase your ability and get the preference from your boss, A group of hugely qualified PECB professionals produced these ISO-IEC-27005-Risk-Manager dumps questions answers after conducting a short survey, After downloading the Exam ISO-IEC-27005-Risk-Manager Quick Prep - PECB Certified ISO/IEC 27005 Risk Manager exam study material in the email attachments, you can start your reviewing, PECB ISO-IEC-27005-Risk-Manager Valid Test Fee You can visit our website, and chat with our service online or via email at any time for we are working 24/7 online.

It prevents the unlicensed from legally working in a profession without meeting ISO-IEC-27005-Risk-Manager government mandated entry requirements, That ushered in the beginning of his career doing battle with computer viruses and online hackers.

Practical ISO-IEC-27005-Risk-Manager Valid Test Fee | Easy To Study and Pass Exam at first attempt & Efficient PECB PECB Certified ISO/IEC 27005 Risk Manager

How to increase your ability and get the preference from your boss, A group of hugely qualified PECB professionals produced these ISO-IEC-27005-Risk-Manager Dumps Questions answers after conducting a short survey.

After downloading the PECB Certified ISO/IEC 27005 Risk Manager exam study material in the email attachments, ISO-IEC-27005-Risk-Manager Valid Test Fee you can start your reviewing, You can visit our website, and chat with our service online or via email at any time for we are working 24/7 online.

However, spending a huge amount ISO-IEC-27005-Risk-Manager Valid Test Fee on such resources is difficult for many PECB Certified ISO/IEC 27005 Risk Manager applicants.

Report this page